- Home
- Sieracki, Bernard; Edgar, Jim;
A Just Cause Page 17
A Just Cause Read online
Page 17
The prosecutor had organized and presented his accusations for maximum effect. The first two charges, the trading of Obama’s senate seat and attempted interference with the Tribune’s editorial board, dealt with information that had been gleaned from the wiretaps in November and December. Using evidence that had been gathered through years of FBI investigations and surveillance, Ellis next turned to alleged criminal activity. The prosecutor started with a topic that continues to generate disagreement: the propriety and influence of campaign contributions. Again, for impact, Ellis read to the senate the title of a section contained in the affidavit: “Evidence Concerning the Solicitation and Receipt of Campaign Contributions in Return for Official Acts by Rod Blagojevich prior to October 2008.” Ellis began by relating the statements of Ali Ata. Ata was a Jordanian immigrant who came to the United States to study engineering. After graduation he held various jobs in the private sector before becoming involved in politics after meeting Alderman Dick Mell in the 1970s. He subsequently met Rod Blagojevich and had contributed to his campaign during his run for congress. Ata’s foray into Illinois politics also introduced him to Tony Rezko. The two became friends and seemed to have much in common. Both were emigrants from the Middle East; Rezko was a Syrian. Ata had agreed to raise funds for Blagojevich during his race for governor, and he and Rezko had discussed a position within state government after the election. He also became acquainted with Chris Kelly and Lon Monk. Ata was duly rewarded for his fund-raising efforts and named president of the newly founded Illinois Finance Authority.11 There is an old refrain in Springfield: Be careful when you are swimming with sharks. Ata had jumped into the pool.
In connection with the ongoing Operation Board Games, the federal investigation of corruption in the Blagojevich administration, the government charged Ata with tax fraud on $1.2 million he had received from Rezko and for lying to FBI agents. Ata reached an agreement with the government, pleaded guilty, testified as a witness for the prosecution during Rezko’s trial, and agreed to cooperate with the federal government in exchange for a lesser sentence (218). Rezko was charged with and convicted of two separate fraud schemes. He was convicted of shaking down millions of dollars from firms doing business before Illinois regulatory boards and of defrauding General Electric Capital Corporation and investors in a pizza restaurant business owned by Rezko.12 Rezko was sentenced to ten and a half years in prison.
Portions of Ata’s testimony during the Rezko trial were introduced as evidence in the criminal complaint against Blagojevich and were contained in the supporting affidavit. Attempting to link Blagojevich with the newly convicted Tony Rezko, Ellis read a portion of Ata’s testimony. Ata claimed that as early as 2001 he was becoming aware of the close relationship between Rezko and Blagojevich, and he related a series of incidents when Rezko had asked Ata to raise money for Blagojevich. Ata always complied.
During the Rezko trial, Ata testified that he had discussed a high-level position within the Blagojevich administration “while a $25,000 donation check to Friends of Blagojevich from Ata was sitting on a table in front of Blagojevich.” Ata also testified that after another substantial contribution, Blagojevich told Ata that he was aware of the contributions, that Ata was a good supporter, and that he understood Ata would be joining the administration. He added that “it had better be a job where Ata could make some money” (221–22, 227–28; para. 16). Ata was apparently surprised at Blagojevich’s response and told Rezko about it. Rezko said he was “not surprised and had heard Rod Blagojevich say things like that before” (228). Ata was eventually appointed director of the Illinois Finance Authority.
The Ata testimony linked Blagojevich with Rezko and served implicitly to revive the question of whether the governor was involved with Rezko’s nefarious deeds. But the account of Ata giving contributions in return for a position also was problematic. The governor had expressed that Ata was a good supporter and that he was aware that Ata would be joining the administration. Ata supported Rod Blagojevich, and Blagojevich did what every successful politician does—he rewarded his supporter by bringing him into the administration. Politics is a process of reciprocal arrangements. Patronage, tempered by the evolving demands of government, has been and always will be a component of our particular form of democracy.13 The only direct link of a quid pro quo was the check for $25,000 that was supposedly on the table in front of Blagojevich, and as verification that the event took place, the senators had only Ata’s word. But the senate was not a court of law, and to remove Blagojevich, the senators did not have to find the defendant guilty of unlawful actions beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution instead sought to establish a pattern of abusive actions that made the governor unfit to hold public office. All the charges were presented to the senate in one impeachment article. The senate would decide on the totality of the article, and the Ata testimony served the purpose of linking Blagojevich and Rezko.
Ellis moved next to the Rezko trial testimony of Joseph Cari, portions of which were also included in the affidavit supporting the criminal complaint. Cari, an experienced fund-raiser on the national level, had served as the national finance chairman for Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign. Cari had been cooperating with federal authorities since being confronted with the charge of extortion in early 2005. Initially, Cari lied to the federal agents about his relationship with Stuart Levine, but when pressed, he finally agreed to cooperate. He was the first person to provide any real evidence that Blagojevich and those around him were going above and beyond what was allowable in the fund-raising arena.14
Cari testified that on October 29, 2003, he flew to New York along with Blagojevich, Rezko, Chris Kelly, and Levine to attend a fund-raiser that he was hosting on behalf of Rod Blagojevich. The airplane was arranged and paid for by Levine, a member of the board of the Illinois Teachers Retirement System. The governor expressed that he was thinking of running for president of the United States and was interested in Cari’s fund-raising experience on the national level. According to Cari, Blagojevich had remarked that it was easier for governors to solicit campaign contributions because they could “award contracts” to campaign contributors. He also informed Cari that Rezko and Kelly were his point people in raising money. Additionally, Blagojevich said that contracts and other Illinois work could be given to contributors who “helped Rod Blagojevich, Rezko and Kelly,” and that “Rezko and Kelly would follow up with Cari.” On the plane ride, Levine informed Cari that a plan was in place where Rezko and Kelly would choose what consultants would do business with state boards, and afterward the consultants would be solicited for campaign contributions. At a subsequent meeting among Rezko, Levine, and Cari, Rezko told Cari that Lon Monk, then the governor’s chief of staff, “would help implement” Rezko’s choices of consultants, and that “in exchange for” Cari’s help in fund-raising, the Blagojevich administration would be “financially helpful to Cari’s business interests” (231–33).
In March 2004 Kelly met with Cari and stated that he was following up on the conversation between the governor and Cari during the plane ride to New York. Cari testified that he initially informed Kelly that he was “not inclined” to help Blagojevich on the national level. Kelly responded “that helping Rod Blagojevich would be good for Cari’s business interests and that Cari . . . could have whatever Cari wanted” (233–34). The opportunity was too great for Cari to pass up, and he became involved in an attempt to extort $750,000 from JER Partners, a Virginia-based private equity firm seeking an $80 million investment from the Teachers Retirement System.
In connection with another attempted shakedown scheme, the federal authorities were also secretly recording conversations on the phone of Stuart Levine. In early 2004 Levine and a contractor named Jacob Kiferbaum attempted to extort the chief executive officer of Edward Hospital in Naperville, Illinois. The hospital was attempting to build a facility in nearby Plainfield. Instead of cooperating with the scheme, however, the Edward executive went to the FBI, and Levine’s phone wa
s subsequently tapped.15 Levine, one of the most disreputable characters associated with Blagojevich and Rezko, was a board member of both the Teachers Retirement System and the Health Facilities Planning Board. His criminal activities included abuse of power on both boards.16 Levine had served in board positions in preceding Republican administrations, but upon Blagojevich’s election, he quickly associated himself with Rezko and Blagojevich. Unrelated to the Edward attempt, Cari had been recorded discussing JER with Levine. The Virginia firm was balking at paying a $750,000 kickback to an associate of Tony Rezko’s as a “finder’s fee.” Levine was upset that the firm was hesitating. Cari, who had connections with JER, intervened and urged the firm to cooperate. He sent several messages to JER “that they needed to hire a consultant and that in Illinois, the Governor and the people around the Governor pick the consultants to be used on particular deals.” If JER did not hire the consultant, Cari said, then it would not receive the money from the Teachers Retirement System (235; para. 30). JER dallied; no one at the firm had ever heard of the supposed consultant, Emerald Star International, and JER became suspicious when it discovered that the consultant’s fax machine was located in the Turks and Caicos Islands.17
Ellis now moved on to an allegation contained in the affidavit concerning the Health Facilities Planning Board. Levine and fellow Health Facilities Planning Board members Imad Almanaseer, a Park Ridge pathologist, and Thomas Beck, a former Cook County comptroller, had testified at Rezko’s trial for the prosecution. All the men had been placed on the board by Tony Rezko. It was the function of the Health Facilities Planning Board to approve permits for the construction of hospitals, medical office buildings, or other medical facilities. Entities seeking to construct facilities were required to receive a certificate of need (CON) from the planning board prior to construction. The prosecutor described how Almanaseer and Beck would receive instructions on how to vote from Rezko. Beck had testified that at times he would provide note cards to Almanaseer conveying Rezko’s instructions on how to vote (232; para. 35–37).
Mercy Hospital Systems, in Chicago, wished to build an expansion and was seeking a CON from the planning board. Initially, Rezko said that Mercy would not receive a CON, arguing that it had submitted a poor application. But Levine had planned well. He had persuaded Mercy to hire Steve Loren, an outside attorney for the Teachers Retirement System and a conspirator with Levine, as well as the contractor on the project, the same one who was involved in the Edward Hospital deal, Jacob Kiferbaum.18 Both Loren and Kiferbaum would advise Mercy to make a contribution. Levine asked Rezko if a contribution would make a difference, and Rezko responded that it might. Rezko gave the go-ahead and Mercy received a CON. Rezko later admitted that he manipulated the vote based on Mercy’s agreement to contribute (238–40; para. 38n10. According to Almanaseer, Rezko stated that the governor wanted it to pass (244; para. 41).
Ellis had been before the senate for more than two hours, but his audience, the members of the senate and those observing from the galleries, remained keenly attentive. One by one the criminal allegations were paraded before the senate. Reports of Blagojevich’s confederates and the federal investigation had been in the news for years. All were aware of the investigations, the parties involved, and the Rezko trial. Now the events of the past years were being synthesized before them, and the enormity of the ongoing saga challenged their moral sensibilities. Ellis’s performance was arduous; the audience was exhausted. The room of seasoned politicians silently looked on, stunned by what they were hearing. Moral outrage permeated the staid senate chamber. Justice Fitzgerald suggested that the senate break for lunch. As the galleries emptied, each audience member seemed to be contemplating what he or she had just witnessed. Few looked at each other, few spoke.
When the trial reconvened, Ellis reminded the senate that the day before, Senators Rickey Hendon and William Haine had asked if any evidence favorable to the governor would be presented. Hendon wanted to defend the governor. Haine, a former county prosecutor, knew the trial would be the subject of future analysis and scrutiny; he wanted the trial to be conducted in a fair manner. Ellis, referring to the affidavit, responded that “there are a few places in here that I think one could argue there is information favorable to the Governor” (246). In fact, there was little. The prosecutor noted only that in Rezko’s discussions with the federal authorities, his recollection had differed from what Ali Ata had said about the quid pro quo for his job at the IFA. Rezko could only remember asking for one check, for $25,000 (247). The prosecutor also offered the obvious: Rod Blagojevich had denied involvement in illegal activities (250).
Ellis then returned to the FBI recordings that were submitted in the supplementing affidavit. Referring to the section of the affidavit titled “Evidence Concerning Efforts to Obtain Campaign Contributions in Exchange for Official Acts,” Ellis reminded the senate that the about-to-be-revealed accusations were incidents that took place after October 2008 and had been captured on the recordings. Someone identified in the affidavit only as Individual A had informed the FBI that the governor was seeking $2.5 million in campaign contributions before the new campaign contribution restrictions became law at the end of the year. Individual A also told of a list of contributors kept by the Friends of Blagojevich and how the governor had conspired to raise the $2.5 million from those on the list. The FBI had obtained the list, and Ellis pointed out that “numerous of the individuals and entities on that list have state contracts or have received public benefits conferred by Rod Blagojevich”—adding, to remind the senate of what everyone already knew—“such as appointments to positions in state government” (254).
According to the informant, on October 6 Rod Blagojevich had told Individual A that he was going to make an announcement of a $1.8 billion allocation for tollway improvements and that he was going to have Lobbyist 1 contact an individual identified in the affidavit as Highway Contractor 1 to ask for $500,000 in contributions. The use of code names to identify individuals in the affidavit was a legal necessity but also added intrigue to the senate presentation. Blagojevich was blunt and straightforward, noting, “I could have made a larger announcement but wanted to see how they performed by the end of the year. If they don’t perform, blank them” (254–55). On October 15, 2008, Blagojevich announced a plan to have new express lanes built on the Illinois Tollway for a cost of $1.8 billion (256).
Ellis told of an intercepted meeting held at the offices of Friends of Blagojevich, where Rod Blagojevich met with an individual identified in the affidavit as Fundraiser A. Later, in the governor’s subsequent criminal trial, Fundraiser A was identified as the governor’s brother, Robert. Also attending the meeting were two lobbyists actively involved in fund-raising, whom Ellis did not identify. Injecting a bit of theater, Ellis told the senate, “The voices on the recording are very low and at times are difficult to hear” (257). He specifically spoke of a call made by the governor to an individual identified in the affidavit as Highway Contractor 1. The contractor, later identified during the criminal trial as Gerald Krozel, was an officer in a company that supplied large amounts of concrete to the state of Illinois and was active in the American Concrete Paving Association.19 During the call, Blagojevich told Krozel he was excited about the “tollway” and then asked the contractor to become involved in fund-raising. He went on to explain that the rules of fund-raising would change with the start of the New Year and, attempting to keep Krozel engaged, ended the conversation by saying, “Call me if you need anything” (258).20
Ellis had begun the litany of charges with the selling of Barack Obama’s senate seat. Now, coming to the end of the criminal allegations, he presented another emotionally charged accusation: that the governor had threatened to withhold $8 million from Children’s Memorial Hospital unless he received a $50,000 contribution. This had incensed the members of the house investigative committee. Ellis reiterated what he had told the house committee, but for the senate he embellished the story. The governor had first approa
ched Children’s Memorial through his brother, Robert. But things did not go well. The hospital’s chief executive officer, Robert told the governor, was balking and supposedly not returning calls. “I’ve left three messages there so I’m going to quit calling. I feel stupid now,” Robert told the governor. Blagojevich asked his brother when he had last spoken with the hospital executive, and Robert replied that it had been “two days ago.” The governor responded, “If they don’t get back to you, then, then last resort is I’ll call” (260–61). Through the taped conversations, it was clear that Blagojevich was contemplating withholding the allocated $8 million unless he received $50,000.
In a later phone conversation, the governor asked Deputy Governor Robert Greenlee, identified in the affidavit as Deputy Governor A, “The pediatric doctors, the reimbursement, has that gone out yet, or is that still on hold?” Greenlee replied, “The rate increase?” and added, “It’s January 1.” “And we have total discretion over it?” Blagojevich asked. Greenlee confirmed that the governor had complete discretion. Blagojevich posed a hypothetical question: “We could pull it back if we need to, budgetary concerns, right?” Greenlee replied, “We sure could, yeah,” to which the governor responded, “Okay. That’s good to know” (261–62).
By mid-November, as the January deadline to raise unlimited campaign funds loomed on the horizon, the Blagojevich fund-raising team shifted into high gear. Robert Blagojevich was instructed to contact Lon Monk, the governor’s former chief of staff and now a well-connected lobbyist, to discuss what they could do about the hospital executive who was not returning phone calls. A frustrated Blagojevich asked, “What do we do with this guy?” (262–63).
Blagojevich was aware that trouble was stirring. In a conversation related to the highway contractor from whom they were attempting to get $500,000, Blagojevich told Robert, who was going to talk to an individual identified as Lobbyist 2, about the contractor’s reluctance to raise the money. “Now, be real careful there,” the governor said. “I mean, the FBI went to see Lobbyist 2. You understand?” (263). The FBI investigations prompted some caution, but they seemed not to faze Rod Blagojevich or alter his efforts to raise money. In 2006 he had been questioned by the FBI in connection with Operation Board Games. The federal authorities asked to meet with him again in late October 2008, but his lawyer, Sheldon Sorosky, informed the FBI that the governor would invoke his Fifth Amendment rights.21 Blagojevich knew that the government was circling and carrying on an active investigation, but it seemed to embolden him, and he took the investigations as a personal challenge. In 2006, just before his election, with Rezko indicted and Stuart Levine pleading guilty, he thought he was above it all. He appeared at a Thirty-Sixth Ward rally in Chicago and “howled, they got nothing, nothing.”22