Consensus Trance Read online

Laws and regulations controlling medical treatments, mainly administered by agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. and the Medicines Control Agency in the U.K., mandate which treatments are safe, effective, and legal;

  Professional medical associations who license doctors dictate what treatments can be prescribed;

  The British and European model of socialized medicine allows the government health departments to decide health policy and purchase treatment on behalf of the public which very rarely includes non-drug-based treatments;

  Medical research bodies controlled by the Drug Trust and the government influence the policies of the previous three.

  1, 2, and 3 are the enforcement arm of the cartel, whilst method 4 is the propaganda arm. In this way, Western public healthcare system is the epitome of fascism: the corporations use government to enforce a cartel at the expense of the public interest.

  Articles in the mainstream media and medical journals have revealed the tip of the public “deathcare” iceberg. Killing 250,000 patients a year, doctors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S., according to the Journal of American Medical Association.[12] An editorial in The Lancet warned of the corruption of medicine by drug companies. The editors of this most esteemed scientific journal asked, “Just how tainted has medicine become [by pharmaceutical industry payoffs]?” They concluded, “Heavily, and damagingly so,” urging doctors to “have the courage to oppose practices that bring the whole of medicine into disrepute.”[13] Up to half the articles on drugs which appear in mainstream medical journals are written by ghost writers employed by drug companies, not the named authors.[14]

  Congressman Dan Burton investigated vaccines for four years as Chairman of the Dan Burton Committee on Government Reform on The Status of Research into Vaccine Safety and Autism. His conclusion was that conflicts of interest at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) were a problem, particularly on the vaccine advisory panel:

  This presents a real paradox when the CDC routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on influential advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines as well as policy matters… All the while these same scientists have financial ties, academic affiliations, and other vested interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight.[15]

  Dr. Matthias Rath, research colleague of Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling and director of Cardiovascular Research at the Linus Pauling Institute in Palo Alto, California, is a world expert in nutritional medicine.[16] On 14 June 2003, Dr. Rath filed a complaint at the International Criminal Court in The Hague against the pharmaceutical industry. The charges brought were “genocide” and other “crimes against humanity” committed in connection with the pharmaceutical industry’s business with disease:

  The accused willfully and systematically maintain cardiovascular diseases, including high blood pressure, heart failure, diabetic complications and other diseases, cancer, infectious diseases including AIDS, osteoporosis and many other of today’s most common diseases that are recognized to be largely preventable by natural means. The accused have deliberately caused the unnecessary suffering and premature death of hundreds of millions of people. The accused systematically and deliberately prevent the eradication of cardiovascular disease, cancer and other diseases by obstructing and blocking the dissemination of life-saving information on the health benefits of natural non-patentable therapies. Thereby, the accused have deliberately caused further unnecessary suffering and the premature death of hundreds of millions of people. The accused deliberately and systematically expand existing diseases and creating new diseases by manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical drugs with short-term symptomatic relief but with known and detrimental long-term side-effects. Thereby the accused have deliberately caused further unnecessary suffering and premature death of hundreds of millions of people.[17]

  In 1996, the U.N. Codex Alimentarius Commission launched a world-wide initiative to restrict access to natural medicines. In August 2005, the Codex has been translated by the E.U. into the European Food Supplements Directive which became law removing thousands of vitamin formulations from the shops and dramatically cutting the dosage of many others. It was followed by the Herbal Medicines Directive which prevents any new herbal formulas ever coming onto the market and removes any herbal product which doesn’t have a proven track record in the E.U. The Pharmaceuticals Directive seeks to expand the scope of the drug classification. In its current wording, even food or water can be included as a substance which “restores, corrects, or modifies physiological functions.”

  The banning of over-the-counter natural medicine creates a two-tier planetary health system as the E.U. laws are imposed in other countries under World Trade Organization’s “harmonization” rules which will include America. Natural medicines will be available on prescription only for those that can afford to pay for private consultations whilst the state-run healthcare systems will continue to prescribe pharmaceuticals to the public.

  The controlling stake in the pharmaceutical industry is held by the same tiny cabal that controls all other major industries. They are committed to planetary depopulation, as their policy papers show. It is not, therefore, just about making money.

  Cancer

  One in three Europeans and one in two Americans will get cancer. Ten million people a year die of cancer worldwide.[18] Despite the trillions of dollars spent on orthodox research and treatment for cancer, the medical establishment is no further forward in finding a cure. The reason is, of course, that the cancer industry is a hugely profitable population control program which depends upon patented drugs.

  The book World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17, by G. Edward Griffin, was first published in 1974. The foreword to the 1997 edition states that absolutely nothing has changed since the first edition, except the actors in the plot. The book details the astonishing fraud and cover-up of the effectiveness of vitamin B17 (laetrile), not least by the Rockefellers’ Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. For five years between 1972 and 1977, the effectiveness of laetrile was tested by Dr. Kanematsu Sugiara at the MSKCC. On 13 June 1973, he produced a report which strongly indicated its anticancer properties. This did not please his employer who then set about denigrating his findings saying that no one else could reproduce them. By 1977, the propaganda war was won. However, in November 1997, Ralph Moss, the Assistant Director of Public Affairs, who wrote the propaganda, did an extraordinary thing: he held his own press conference at which he named the MSKCC officials who had collaborated in the massive laetrile cover-up. He was fired the next day, and the media soon forgot all about it.[19]

  Since the FDA banned laetrile in 1971, thousands of Americans have traveled to Mexico and Germany every year to be treated with it. American doctors can have their licenses taken away for prescribing laetrile, or even face imprisonment in California due to its “anti-quack” cancer legislation. In the U.K., it is illegal for anyone other than registered medical practitioners to claim they can cure or treat cancer.[20] Unfortunately, it is the Rockefeller/IG Farben monopoly treatment of cancer which is quackery: there is no evidence that chemotherapy or radiotherapy increase life expectancy. In fact, both are extremely toxic and often lethal treatments which themselves destroy the patient’s immune system and cause cancer and death.

  Dr. Lorraine Day is an internationally acclaimed orthopedic trauma surgeon and bestselling author. She spent 15 years on the faculty of the University of California School of Medicine in San Francisco as Associate Professor and Vice Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics. She was also Chief of Orthopedic Surgery at San Francisco General Hospital and is recognized worldwide as an AIDS expert. Ten years ago, she contracted breast cancer and reached the terminal stage. However, she refused orthodox treatment and devised for herself a ten-point plan which didn’t involve drugs or even vitamin supplements. Knowing that cancer is the consequence of a dysfunctional immune system, poor diet, and lifestyle a
nd environmental factors, she cured herself by addressing these issues. Dr. Day, like many thousands of others, is alive and well today by taking matters into her own hands. She is roundly attacked in the mainstream press for her crusade against the fraud of the cancer industry and the drug industry in general. Her website is at www.drday.com.

  Vaccination: The Weapon of Choice

  It seems illogical that self-proclaimed population control advocates would spend billions of dollars on vaccination programs trying to save the lives of millions of people in the Third World. The grim reality is that they are covertly murdering and sterilizing these poor people under the guise of public health. Launched in 1999, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) is a partnership of the who’s who in population control: the Rockefeller Foundation, the $24 billion Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the United Nations Foundation (a $1 billion endowment by Ted Turner), the World Bank, the World Health Organization and Western governments.

  The stated mission of GAVI and the Vaccine Fund is to ensure that “all the world’s children have equal access to lifesaving vaccines.” Unfortunately, the more malnourished a child is the more likely it is to suffer a severe reaction to immune-suppressing vaccinations, especially when they are given in combination. Even the American Vaccination Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS), set up in 1990, gives some indication of the carnage caused by vaccines. 90% of all adverse reactions go unreported to VAERS, and chronic conditions which emerge months or years later, such as autism, autoimmune diseases, allergies, cancer, and neurodevelopment disorders, are not officially recognized as consequences of vaccinations anyway. The report by United Press International should be read bearing this in mind:

  As of the end of last year, the system contained 244,424 total reports of possible reactions to vaccines, including 99,145 emergency room visits, 5,149 life-threatening reactions, 27,925 hospitalizations, 5,775 disabilities, and 5,309 deaths, according to data compiled by Dr. Mark Geier, a vaccine researcher in Silver Spring, md. The data represents roughly 1 billion doses of vaccines, according to Geier.[21]

  An investigative report by Roman Bystrianyk for HealthSentinel.com shows that there is little epidemiological evidence for the contribution of vaccines to the wide-scale reduction in death rates from infectious diseases.[22] The Vital Statistics of the United States, published by the Bureau of the Census and the U.S. Department of Health, contain death rates from infectious diseases. From 1900 to 1963, when the measles vaccine was introduced, death rates from measles had declined from 13.3 per 100,000 to 0.2 per 100,000—a 98% decrease. From 1900 to 1949, death rates from whooping cough declined from 12.2 per 100,000 to 0.5 per 100,000—a 96% decrease. From 1900 to 1949, death rates from diphtheria declined from 40.3 per 100,000 to 0.4 per 100,000—a 99% decrease.

  Mortality data in England and Wales provided by the Office of National Statistics in 1997 shows an identical picture. From 1850 to 1968, when the measles vaccine was introduced, death rates from measles had declined from a range of 52.11 to 26.6 per 100,000 to 0.11 per 100,000—a range of 99.6% to 99.8% decrease. From 1860 to 1955, death rates from whooping cough declined from a range of 43.73 to 60.86 per 100,000 to 0.2 per 100,000—a 99.5% to 99.7% decrease.

  Also note that scarlet fever and typhoid were eliminated in both countries without any vaccination program.

  Public health experts have long recognized these facts. Thomas McKeown (1912–1988) was professor of social medicine in the University of Birmingham Medical School between 1950 and 1978. He is still regarded as a major social philosopher of medicine and known for his important works on epidemiology and the practice and purpose of medicine. His conclusion was that infectious diseases were declining well before widespread vaccination and that “reductions in deaths associated with infectious diseases (air-, water-, and food-borne diseases) cannot have been brought about by medical advances, since such diseases were declining long before effective means were available to combat them.”

  A paper published in The Lancet in January 1977 by the Department of Community Medicine also indicated that vaccinations were not responsible for the decline in mortality:

  Vaccination, beginning on small scale in some places around 1948 and on a national scale in 1957, did not affect the rate of decline if it be assumed that one attack usually confers immunity, as in most major communicable diseases of childhood. … The steady decline of whooping cough between 1930 and 1957 is predictive of a linear exponential decay characteristic of a general and progressive lessening in the volume and spread of infection among the susceptible population. With this pattern well established before 1957, there is no evidence that vaccination played a major role in the decline in incidence and mortality in the trend of events.

  An even more recent editorial statement from the Journal of Pediatrics, in December 1999, declared that proper sanitation was largely responsible for the early large declines in infectious diseases:

  … The largest historical decrease in morbidity and mortality caused by infectious disease was experienced not with the modern antibiotic and vaccine era, but after the introduction of clean water and effective sewer systems.

  Again, in the August 2001 edition of the American Journal of Infection Control, epidemiologists concluded that,

  … except for the smallpox vaccination, which was introduced in 1798 and made compulsory in England in 1853, the overall contribution of medical innovations to the health revolution of the 1800s is difficult to validate.

  Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine arrived on the scene only after disease mortality rates already had been reduced significantly; measles, rubella, and polio vaccines did not become available until the middle of the 20th century.

  Immune Suppression

  Because they do not trigger a proper immune response, vaccinations give live viruses and other live vaccine contaminants a head start in the body. Normally, microorganisms have to pass through the mucous membranes in the mouth and gastrointestinal tract, which are lined with Immunoglobulin A. Interaction with IgA triggers a cellular immune response which precedes the antibody/humoral response. Injected microorganisms bypass the mucousal/cellular immune system and directly trigger the antibody-producing plasma cells in the bone marrow. This is why vaccine manufactures add immune system stimulating “adjuvants” such as aluminium, lipopolysaccharide, and squalene. Live microorganisms also take advantage of significant immune suppression caused by the vaccination itself. Research found that 20% of measles vaccines recipients have chronic measles infections in their brains later in life indicating that live virus vaccines create greater risk of developing the disease.[23] In the New England Journal of Medicine of July 1994, a study found that over 80% of children under 5 years of age who had contracted whooping cough had been fully vaccinated against it.[24]

  Dr. Archie Kalokerinos is a Life Fellow of the Royal Society for Health, a Fellow of the International Academy of Preventive Medicine, Fellow of the Australasian College of Biomedical Scientists, Fellow of the Hong Kong Medical Technology Association, and a Member of the New York Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he was awarded the A.M.M. (Australian Medal of Merit) for “outstanding scientific research.” On the subject of vaccines he comments:

  My final conclusion after forty years or more in this business [medicine] is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organization and … [other vaccine-promoting] organizations is one of murder and genocide… You cannot immunize sick children, malnourished children, and expect to get away with it. You’ll kill far more children than would have died from natural infection. It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through Africa, South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving children… They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of those susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they developed as a result of being vaccinated. The vaccination reduced their immune levels and acted like an infection. Many got septicemia, gastroenteritis, etc., or made their nutritional status worse, a
nd they died from malnutrition. So there were very few susceptible infants left alive to get measles. It’s one way to get good statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is what they literally did.[25]

  American children receive up to forty vaccinations before the age of two. Dr. H. H. Fudenberg, world-renowned immunologist with hundreds of publications to his credit, made the following comments:

  One vaccine decreases cell-mediated immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%… All triple vaccines (MMR, DTAP) markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections.[26]

  Like hiv, the measles virus is particularly immune suppressing, hence the danger of the live virus measles vaccine. In 2001, GAVI launched an initiative to vaccinate 200 million children in sub-Saharan Africa against measles, despite the fact that hiv infection was rampant there.

  Vaccine Contaminants

  As well as the dangerous assault on fragile immune systems by the vaccine’s active ingredients, there are live contaminants in vaccines. Microorganism contamination is a relatively common finding in many commercial vaccines. One study in the journal Vaccine, in 1986, found that about 6% of commercial vaccines tested were contaminated with a tiny bacteria called mycoplasma. Most U.S. military personnel deployed to the Gulf in 1990 received up to 30 vaccinations in a two to three-day period, some probably experimental and administered without proper informed consent. Recent studies by the Institute of Molecular Medicine found that nearly 40% of veterans with Gulf War Illness were infected with mycoplasma fermentans.[27] 100% of Gulf War Illness patients who developed the motor neuron disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, tested positive for systemic mycoplasma infection.[28]

  The polio vaccine administered to 30 million Americans during the late fifties and early sixties was contaminated with the monkey virus SV40. This is believed to be responsible for an epidemic of cancers.[29] When SV40 was discovered in rhesus monkey kidney cells during the early 1960s, the manufacturers switched rapidly to cells from African green monkeys. However, Dr. John Martin, an FDA scientist, discovered in 1972 that these cells were also contaminated, this time with a cytomegalovirus. His requests to have the vaccine properly tested have gone unanswered by the FDA, because the manufacturers can hide behind “proprietary interests.”