Consensus Trance Read online

  [6] Ibid, p. 390.

  [7] John Marks. The Search for the Manchurian Candidate. Times Books, 1979, pp. 60-61.

  [8] Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations. U.S. Senate, April 1976, p. 391.

  [9] Mark Phillips and Cathy O’Brien, Project Monarch, 1993.

  [10] Barbara G. Walker. The Woman’s Dictionary of Symbols and Sacred Objects. HarperCollins, 1988.

  [11] Marshall Cavendish. Man, Myth and Magic. 1995.

  [12] Dr. Corydon Hammond. The Greenbaum Speech. 1992; Mark Phillips and Cathy O’Brien. Project Monarch Programming Definitions. 1993.

  [13] Gerald L. Posner. Mengele: The Complete Story. McGraw-Hill, 1986.

  [14] Lucette Matalon Lagnado. Dr. Josef Mengele and the Untold Story of the Twins of Auschwitz. Morrow, 1991.

  [15] Gordon Thomas. Journey Into Madness: The Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse. Bantam Books, 1989.

  [16] Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips. Trance-Formation of America. 1995.

  [17] John DeCamp. The Franklin Cover-Up, Child Abuse, Satanism and Murder in Nebraska. AWT Inc., 1992.

  [18] Anton Chaitkin, “Franklin Witnesses Implicate FBI and U.S. Elites in Torture and Murder of Children.” The New Federalist, 1993.

  [19] Jon Rappoport. “CIA Experiments with Mind Control on Children.” Perceptions Magazine, September/October 1995, p. 56.

  [20] David E. Rosenbaum, Esq. First Draft: Overview of Investigation of the Group, 1983–1993.

  Population Control

  License to Kill … Billions

  By Michael Nield

  “Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.” —Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, 1953.

  “… In holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.” —President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Farewell Address, 1961.

  With the restraints of moral conventions and democracy dispensed with, the new Utopia offers the holy grail of all dictators: control over life itself. Yet, some of that control has existed for decades in spite of our notionally free and democratic societies. Science offers the great advantage that very few people can understand it. Whoever pays for its conduct and its presentation in the popular media can dictate the consensus on any given issue, simply by asserting that his committee of experts are the most distinguished. The less well funded and represented dissenters are labeled the dangerous “quacks” and “junk scientists.” And this is how the petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel has killed, injured, and sterilized millions of people over the last hundred years. The same forces that supported Hitler have continued to operate covertly ever since.

  Population control is multifaceted. It includes: reducing the number of people; eugenics; reducing intelligence levels; mind control; increasing poverty; and creating financial dependence on the pharmaceutical industry. Various facets of the population control agenda can be served simultaneously by the same device.

  Facing up to this 21st century holocaust merely requires an acknowledgment of the moral position of its elevated sponsors. Some might be unashamedly evil, but most are Malthusians who believe that the there is no sanctity in human life. To “save the planet,” we must kill off most of the people, so said Jacques-Yves Cousteau in the UNESCO Courier of November 1991:

  The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics—it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes… This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.

  Bertrand Russell, one of the 20th century’s most eminent philosophers, said the same in his book, The Impact of Science on Society:

  At present the population of the world is increasing… War so far has had no great effect on this increase… I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others… If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full…

  Russell also supported the idea of engineering human beings to meet social requirements:

  Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method… Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.

  The progressively dumbed down society described in Brave New World is desirable to those in the ruling class who believe in “command and control.” However, with the internet serving as a counterweight to official disinformation, we can now afford ourselves some protection against a health catastrophe we might otherwise endure at their hands.

  Funding Population Control

  Limiting population growth has been a preoccupation of the European and American elite throughout the 20th century. The Population Council was established in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller III. The multibillion dollar World WiLDLife Fund is sponsored by British and Dutch Royalty, and the elite environmental think-tank, the Club of Rome, counts several world leaders amongst its members. The U.N.’s population control activities receive funding from all the major charitable foundations, especially the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation. Ted Turner’s $1 billion United Nations Foundation and the $24 billion Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are entirely devoted to population control activities, although they are disguised as public health campaigns.

  The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA, formerly the United Nations Fund for Population Activities) is the single largest international source of overt funding for population and reproductive health programs. Since it began operations in 1969, the Fund has provided nearly $6 billion in “assistance” to developing countries. The UNFPA only manages one quarter of the world’s population control budget for developing countries, which is in excess of $1 billion per year. The Netherlands, Britain, and Japan were by far the biggest funders of UNFPA in 2001, providing almost 50% of the total $396 million. Meanwhile, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) gives substantially more money to population control programs than to healthcare and food assistance.

  Aims and Methods

  The population control agenda is presented to the public as a universal concern for planetary resources and environmental pollution and, to a lesser degree, socio-economic deprivation, women’s rights, and reproductive health. Whatever the truth of these arguments, the point is that population control is coercive. The policy papers on population control contain objectives that are so extreme that coercion would certainly be needed to meet them. The 1972 benchmark environmentalist publication, The Limits to Growth,[1] predicted planetary meltdown by 2050 unless radical limits to population growth were imposed. In 1974, this was translated into hard U.S. national security policy by National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger. His lengthy National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) laid out the aims, timescale, and methods of U.S. foreign policy for limiting the population growth of “lesser developed countries.” Measures were to be taken to keep the world’s population growing beyond 8 billion, meaning 500 million fewer people by year 2000 and 3 billion fewer by 2050. However, many suspect tha
t this is nowhere near the real target of the elite and their Malthusian collaborators. The American population control think-tank, Negative Population Growth (NPG), Inc., recommended in 1992 that the population of the U.S. should be 125–150 million, requiring a 50% cut from its current level.[2] In 1995, the same think-tank published a study recommending an 80% reduction in global population.[3] In NSSM 200, Henry Kissinger stated that no single approach would “solve” the population problem. Multiple and seemingly unconnected approaches would be more efficient.

  Environmentalism

  The environmental movement has been an important tool for justifying population reduction. Banning the pesticide DDT in the early 1970s was a huge victory for the population controllers. DDT was introduced as an insecticide in the 1940s and promised to eradicate malaria, one of the world’s biggest natural killers. Despite all the scientific evidence to the contrary, the powerful environmental lobby declared it dangerous, and so it was banned. As a result, hundreds of millions of lives have been lost to malaria unnecessarily. Alexander King, president of the Club of Rome, confirmed the real purpose of the ban: “My own doubts came when ddt was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with ddt, in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem.”[4]

  Public Health Policy and Western Medicine

  The Drug Trust

  The pharmaceutical industry is a multitrillion dollar business, and healthcare spending consumes a significant proportion of Western GDP. One family in particular has played a key role in the development of the pharmaceutical industry—The Rockefellers. The Rockefellers invested in the German chemical and pharmaceutical giant, IG Farben in the 1930s. Sterling Drug, Inc., was the main cog and largest holding company in the Rockefeller drug empire during the first half of the 20th century.[5] Today, Rockefeller-owned Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc., accounts for nearly half of the chemotherapy sales in the world.[6]

  The five leading private medical research institutes in the U.S. are either controlled by or affiliated to the Rockefellers: Rockefeller University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (ADARC), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories. These institutes conduct cutting edge medical research which affects the world’s entire healthcare system. A brief chronology of the establishment of health and educational institutions by John D. Rockefeller:

  1889–1909: The University of Chicago.

  1901: The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, now Rockefeller University.

  1909: Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for Eradication of Hookworm Disease.

  1910: In partnership with the Harriman family, funded the Station for Experimental Evolution and Eugenics Records Office in Cold Spring Harbor.

  1914: The China Medical Board.

  The $65 million endowment of the Rockefeller Institute dwarfed the budget of the Public Health Service in the first three decades of 20th century.[7] Rockefeller University is a world leading center for pharmaceutical medicine. Its website boasts:

  The Rockefeller University is a world-renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics and physics. The university’s 76 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic research and study a diverse range of biological and biomedical problems… Throughout Rockefeller’s history, 24 of its scientists have won Nobel Prizes, 21 have won Lasker Awards and 20 have garnered the National Medal of Science, the highest science award given by the United States..[8]

  The world’s premier AIDS research institution, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, is affiliated to the Rockefeller University by academic, infrastructural, and administrative ties. Established in 1991, ADARC is the world’s largest private research laboratory devoted solely to biomedical research on HIV/AIDS and is currently co-leading China’s largest AIDS “treatment program.” Rockefeller-owned Time magazine voted their man at ADARC, Dr. David Ho, “Man of The Year” in 1996.

  The Howard Hughes Medical Institute has worked in partnership with the Rockefeller University since 1986. Founded in 1953, at close of financial year 2002, Howard Hughes Medical Institute endowment was $10.3 billion making it the second largest philanthropy in the USA after the $24 billion Bill Gates Foundation. HHMI currently employs seven Nobel Prize winners.

  The Rockefeller University has close ties with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. During early 1970s, Laurence S. Rockefeller sat on the board of the MSKCC and was trustee of the Sloan Foundation. The Rockefeller University archive reveals that the Rockefellers provided substantial endowment for Memorial Sloan-Kettering. The New York Cancer Hospital, founded in 1884, was one of the first hospitals devoted entirely to the research and treatment of cancer. Later known as the General Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases (1899–1916), and then as Memorial Hospital, it was vastly expanded and modernized in 1936 as a result of contributions by John D. Rockefeller II and the General Education Board. The Sloan foundation was founded in 1934 by Alfred P. Sloan, Chairman of General Motors. In 1945, the Sloan-Kettering Institute was created to conduct intensive research in oncology. In 1960, the MSKCC was formed to serve as an administrative umbrella for the hospital and institute. Rockefeller’s modernization involved relocating Memorial to a new site just across the street from Rockefeller University. Nelson A. Rockefeller was a Member of Westchester County (NY) Board of Health from January 1933 to June 1953. Westchester became home to the Phelps Hospital founded in 1952 with Rockefeller money. With a donation of 66 acres on the Hudson River and $500,000 by the Arthur Curtis James Foundation, along with a pledge of $800,000 toward the project by John D. Rockefeller II, the new hospital was born. The Phelps Hospital is now one of the sites of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

  The Station for Experimental Evolution and the Eugenics Records Office was endowed with funds from the Rockefeller and Harriman families in 1910. Since the 1970s, the renamed Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories have been home to the world’s cutting edge research programs on cancer as well as research in neurobiology, plant genetics, genomics, and bioinformatics. James Watson, co-discoverer of DNA, was its director from 1969 to 1994, and it is undertaking work to map the human genome on behalf of the Human Genome Project. The early research into eugenics at Cold Spring was mirrored by the Rockefellers’ funding of racial hygiene research in Germany at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munich and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity in Berlin in the late 1920s. However, the roots of this pharmaceutical stranglehold penetrate deep into the American education system. In 1910, a report was produced by the American Medical Association (AMA) that changed the course of medical history. Previously, American medical education had been unregulated and suffered a bad reputation. Seeing an opportunity, the Carnegie Foundation offered to produce guidelines and qualifications for medical schools on behalf of the AMA. The Flexner Report, named after Abraham Flexner of the Carnegie Foundation, included recommendations to strengthen courses in pharmacology. Rockefeller and Carnegie then commenced to pour money into those institutions which conformed to the new requirements. To date, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, Sloan, Kellogg and other foundations have showered over a billion dollars on the medical schools of America.[9]

  According to The Drug Story by Morris A. Bealle, an investigation into Rockefeller influence on medicine, the Rockefeller Foundation was the single largest contributor to American medical education:

  Harvard, with its well-publicized medical school, has received $8,764,433 of Rockefeller’s Drug Trust money, Yale got $7,927,800, Johns Hopkins $10,418,531, Washington University in St. Louis $2,842,132, New York’s Columbia University $5,424,371, Cornell University $1,709,072, etc., etc.

  The Rockefellers and their alumni have held key positions directing American public health, and were directly involved with the establishment of American public health institutions. In 1938, Jewish G
erman researchers fleeing Hitler were welcomed at the newly founded National Institutes of Health (NIH) built on a private estate in Bethesda, Maryland, donated by John D. Rockefeller.[10] This is still the home of the NIH today. Nelson A. Rockefeller was Under Secretary of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) from June 1953 to December 1954. Prior to this appointment, he was Chairman, Special Committee on Defense Organization from February to April 1953 and afterwards, Consultant to Secretary of Defense on Organization of the Department of Defense from January to April 1958. Between January 1953 and December 1958, he was Chairman of the President’s Advisory Committee on Government Organization.

  Rockefeller took the HEW job to reorganize the health department to meet the secrecy requirements of U.S. biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons program which required substantial testing on unwitting American and Canadian citizens as described in the section on AIDS below. Laurence S. Rockefeller was also on the board of the Community Blood Council of Greater NY, funded by the Sloan Foundation.[11] Rockefeller University faculty boasts 34 National Academy of Science members and eight of the New York Academy of Sciences’ Council currently work for Rockefeller-connected companies or institutions.

  The Business with Disease

  Charges of genocide against the Drug Trust are appropriate on three counts:

  Most pharmaceuticals do not cure diseases;

  Pharmaceuticals kill and injure vast numbers of people;

  Pharmaceuticals are forced upon the public by governments, and effective alternatives are denied.

  Given the first two charges, it might seem impossible for the third to be accomplished in a free society. This is how it’s done: