Many Love Read online

  PRAISE FOR

  MANY LOVE

  “Johnson has created an unjaded portrait of ‘unconventional’ love, and reading it feels like you’ve both been introduced to a new, exceedingly cool best friend and granted access to a kind of interpersonal, anthropological wisdom that will cause you to reevaluate every preconceived ideal you had about family and commitment. To call Many Love compulsively readable is a gross understatement. This book will split you wide open.”

  —Kristen Radtke, author of Imagine Wanting Only This

  “Sophie Lucido Johnson is funny, feminist, smart, and, annoyingly, a very talented illustrator to boot. Many Love is a compassionate and convincing love story, and a must-read for anyone who feels left out by our culture’s one-size-fits-all heterosexual monogamous norms.”

  —Katie Heaney, author of Never Have I Ever and Would You Rather?

  “Many Love may be about polyamory, but it’s just like any touching coming-of-age story—just with a bit of a different interpersonal structure. Warm, revealing, and honest, it’s a welcoming read, no matter what structure for love you have in your life.”

  —Jen A. Miller, author of Running: A Love Story

  “Many Love is funny, poignant, and valuable for any person interested in relationships—be it with lovers, friends, or oneself. With a beautiful intertwining of words and pictures, of thoughts and ideas, Sophie Lucido Johnson has crafted a personal story that’s universally applicable. I have many loves for Many Love.”

  —Myq Kaplan

  “Sophie Lucido Johnson’s Many Love is completely delightful. Smart, sparkly, and kind, like a great conversation with an old friend. Johnson brings sanity, perspective, and wit to her examination of the propaganda that surrounds traditional romance, and offers a well-considered way of reinventing it.”

  —Liana Finck, author of Passing for Human

  “[A] refreshingly candid and provocative narrative . . . . [T]he author adds a dash of humor and incisive observation to almost every page of her text with comic book–style drawings . . . . Johnson’s multipronged approach not only demystifies a much-maligned and misunderstood practice; it also makes for enjoyable, accessible reading. Illuminating and entertaining.”

  —Kirkus Reviews

  Thank you for downloading this Simon & Schuster ebook.

  * * *

  Get a FREE ebook when you join our mailing list. Plus, get updates on new releases, deals, recommended reads, and more from Simon & Schuster. Click below to sign up and see terms and conditions.

  CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

  Already a subscriber? Provide your email again so we can register this ebook and send you more of what you like to read. You will continue to receive exclusive offers in your inbox.

  Contents

  FAQ

  Acknowledgments

  About the Author

  Notes

  Bibliography

  Index

  INTRODUCTION

  Choose Your Own Romantic Adventure

  My boyfriend and I were on our third date with another couple when our cat Jean died.

  That’s not quite accurate: we were chopping up cucumbers and avocadoes for a romantic DIY sushi night with Tony and Meg when our cat’s legs collapsed beneath him. I met Meg through work—a place where you are traditionally quiet about being in the kind of relationship in which you and your partner could be dating another couple. But after I left my job, Meg and I stayed friends on Facebook, and Facebook is a considerably less private sphere. On social media, I’m out as being polyamorous—that is to say, I practice ethical, consensual nonmonogamy. Meg messaged me one night to tell me that she was poly, too. “Let’s be friends, possibly?” she wrote. “Or feel free to ignore this message; I promise not to find it rude if you choose to.”

  Meg had been my superior at work, and from the moment I met her I had a big, fat, unprofessional crush on her. She wrote scathing, intelligent news analyses (superhot when you’re a writer), and she had a dexterity to her walk; later I would find out she was into circus arts and acroyoga. So, months later, after I’d left the job and figured I would probably never see Meg again, I was dizzy to get a message from her. I responded that, uh, yes, we should totally be friends, I mean, ha ha, I’m not weirdly eager or anything; I’m, like, superbusy, but if she wanted to, you know, I would like to . . . whatever. Somehow, through the grace of the universe, this rambling spurt of a reply didn’t drive Meg away, and a few weeks later, she came over for dinner.

  At dinner, I tried to act cool and look Meg in the eye a few times, but it was difficult, because she was even more beautiful and interesting than I had remembered her being. Luckily, my boyfriend, Luke, was also there, and he quelled the tension. He’s a pro at asking good questions (“What’s the weirdest thing you’ve ever done for love?”)—it’s one of the things I loved the most about him when we met. Regardless of the presence of a third person, though, I still felt like I was on a date with Meg. Luke knew I had a crush on her; if she didn’t know I had a crush on her, then she was (mercifully) ignoring a few pretty obvious signs. I think the vibe was felt around the table.

  We went to the sex party, which was amazing. I’m sure you have a lot of questions about the sex party (such as, “What is a sex party, exactly?”), and I promise that, eventually, I will answer them. But this part of the book is about my cat, who left the world before his time, and the people who were there to care for us in his wake.

  At the sex party, we met Tony, who is one of Meg’s partners (the one she lives with). We also, technically, met Meg’s other partner and a host of people Meg dates or has dated or plays with from time to time. But Luke and I both felt drawn to Tony, who was refreshingly forthcoming. A week later, Meg asked if Luke and I wanted to go on a date with her and Tony, and we both thought that sounded great.

  If I had been nervous about my friendly initial dinner with dreamy Meg, I was a wreck about going on an actual date with her and her partner. It was especially terrifying to embark on dating another couple as a couple—territory neither Luke nor I had any practice with or guidelines for. At the end of the date, if I wanted to kiss Meg or Tony or both of them, did I ask? Did we all have to kiss the first kiss together, in a kind of Spring Break–style quadrilateral?

  The date was really like any other date: We ate dinner and learned about one another. We asked questions about childhood; we told stories about past loves. There was kissing at the end, and while I’d love to get into that right now in detail, I’m telling you about this date right here and now only because I want you to know, at least marginally, the nature of our relationship with Meg and Tony before I tell you about the night Jean passed away.

  Everything was nearly ready for our date that night: the sushi rice had been cooked and was cooling, and the seaweed was artfully arranged on a red plate. I’d even tempered some chocolate and was dipping butter cookies in it for dessert. When Jean’s legs collapsed, I called the vet, hoping he would say something like, “Oh, yeah, cats’ legs collapse all the time. That’s normal. Give him three sips of water and he should be good as new.” But instead, he said that we needed to take him to the emergency room immediately. So Luke got the cat carrier, and I called Meg.

  I should pause to say that while people who have cats are generally a little crazy about them, I am high on the spectrum of this feline-related lunacy. I buy food for my cats that costs significantly more than the food I buy for myself. When I go out of town, I call the cat sitter and ask to speak to my cats on the phone. Jean was one of a pair; Puppy, the other cat, seemed deeply troubled by Jean’s sudden collapse, and that felt like another major crisis that had to be dealt with.

  “Come over,” I told Meg distantly. “Call Tony and tell him what happened, and when you get here,
we’ll sort it out.”

  I told Luke to take Jean to the vet and to call me when he got there, and we would go from there.

  When she came into the apartment, Meg didn’t even take off her coat before she held me tightly in her arms. “What do you need,” she said, making it a statement, not a question; like she was going to do whatever it took to make this situation better and easier. I didn’t have words. I just let her hold my hands.

  Tony arrived just as Luke called from the vet. I shut myself in the bedroom and took in the bad news: it was a heart condition, and it was serious, and they didn’t know if Jean would make it.

  When I left the bedroom to tell Meg and Tony, I couldn’t get the words out.

  The second time I said it, Meg seemed to grasp the subtext: I needed them to stay. I needed someone to be with Puppy; I needed someone to hold us to the ground.

  Tony and Meg made the sushi. When we had to pay an ungodly amount of money for the procedures Jean required, I called Meg and had her find my emergency credit card and read the number to me over the phone. When we got home, exhausted, defeated, and in total despair, they were still there. They stayed. They cleaned. When they finally left, holding us both a little longer than normal during their good-byes, I thought to myself, “This is what love is.”

  FAQ

  My friends ask me a lot of questions about polyamory. Some of them are ridiculous—“Since you’re poly, won’t you condone my cheating on my husband?”—and some are not. Chances are, if you’re reading this book, you have a few questions, too. To help get things off the ground, let’s get a few of them out of the way.

  What is polyamory? Isn’t it just a failure to commit?

  There’s a whole camp of people—many of whom are my relatives, fearfully praying for my soul when I say I’m polyamorous—who think that polyamory is about having sex with whomever you want, whenever you want, without a whole lot of emotional consideration. This definition is all wrong. “Poly” comes from the Greek word for “many,” and “amory” comes from the Latin word for “love”; literally, the word means “many love.” When I say that I’m polyamorous, that is what I mean: I have many loves. I am deeply committed to my loves. When I have sex, I do it with emotional consideration and communication, because loving someone means being compassionate about the way they feel, and that can be complicated when jealousy is involved. But to me, polyamory is not really about sex at all. It’s not “many sex,” it’s “many love.” The love I hold for my closest friends, with whom I do not sleep, is an enormous part of it. Polyamory is about shifting my definition of love to embrace the diversity of relationships in my life, and about allowing myself to prioritize all of those relationships according to their demands.

  Love is infinite. This shouldn’t even be controversial. There is nothing more beautiful about the human species than our capacity to love; as a society, we’ve come a long way in the versions of love we accept. But saying “Yeah, our girlfriend Meg and our boyfriend Tony are going to come to the beach with us this weekend” raises eyebrows nevertheless. It can still be hard to have conversations about polyamory because there is something very fixed in the modern mind-set about how relationships ought to look—i.e., monogamous. Conversations with my friends about polyamory often go like this:

  Are you out? What does your family think? I mean, aren’t you ashamed?

  I don’t have much of a choice in the matter, because I decided to write a book about it. Everyone in my family had the annoying habit of wanting to know what the book was about. For a while, I just said, “It’s a book about love.” This led people to believe that I was entering the seemingly limitless field of women’s romance novels. As much as I do someday hope to write a book titled The Man Stallion of the Dude Ranch of Shangri-La, I felt I was misleading people. I slowly started to tell those I trusted most in the world that the book was actually about polyamory—a statement that was almost always met with a deflated “Uh-huh” and a quick change of subject.

  I get it. I used to feel exactly the same way. A few years ago, my friend Leslie was dating an attractive guy who openly had another girlfriend, and I thought it was fucked up. I told Leslie all the time that she deserved better than that; it was hard to see a guy dating (and sleeping with) two different women—and doing so without trying to hide any of it—as anything other than misogyny. And maybe that guy was being misogynistic, I don’t know; I wasn’t in that relationship. Looking back, the fact that Leslie had to compromise what she really wanted (to be monogamous) in order to be with that guy sends up a few red flags for me.

  But a few years later, when my roommates (who were dating) started to talk about being in a polyamorous relationship, it seemed different, because they were so open and conversational about it; communication and transparency were at the center of the whole dynamic. As I listened to their conversations on the topic (read: as I pretended to look at magazines in the living room with headphones on while they chatted candidly in the adjacent room), I started to think that maybe there were aspects of this relationship style that would work for me, too. Until that point, I’d believed polyamory was all about sex; now, I started to see it as a pretty versatile relationship structure.

  Just a note, though, specifically for my Grandma Bev: There’s a whole chapter in here that’s about sex. It’s clearly labeled. In that chapter, I do talk candidly and at some length about sex. You, Grandma Bev, should skip that chapter. I love you.

  What’s your favorite book about polyamory?

  No question about it: Deborah Anapol’s Polyamory in the 21st Century. I will cite it roughly one million times over the course of the next few hundred pages. Poly blogger Alan M. (a lot of self-identifying polyamorous people don’t reveal their last names because they hold corporate jobs, and, unfortunately, it’s not always socially acceptable to be polyamorous) notes that it “was often called [polyamory’s] bible.”1

  Guys, this book is great. Here is just one teensy tiny sample: “Polyamory has more to do with an internal attitude of letting love evolve without expectations and demands than it does with the number of partners involved.”2 Right? Isn’t that beautiful?

  A Little More on Deborah Anapol and Her Cohort

  Anapol, who died unexpectedly in 2015, had a PhD in clinical psychology, and she used what she knew about the human brain to make living in this world a little kinder, easier, and better all around.

  I mention the PhD because Anapol and her cohort can come off as sort of New Agey: she was a major player in an organization called Loving More, which still holds retreats and talks about “pelvic heart floors” and the like. The person who allegedly popularized the term “polyamory” in the 1990s called herself (and I am not making this up) Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart. I know how all of this sounds, and I, too, tend to shrink away from any movement that might employ words like “vibrations” or “aura” in day-to-day practice.

  I talked to Alan M. on the phone recently; he’s been an on-again, off-again polyamorist for almost fifty years. Alan, who is sixty-four, is gentle and soft-spoken; he also seems to know everything there is to know about polyamory—and he knows how New Agey some of the people in the movement can seem. Speaking specifically about an annual summer retreat in the woods, Alan told me, “This sounds like New Agey hoo-ha, but of all the New Agey–type things I’ve seen, this has more intellectual integrity than what’s generally out there.” In fact, a lot of people who are at the forefront of polyamorist efforts have hard-science backgrounds. Alan described them as “experimenters.”

  I liked talking to Alan. He and many of his compatriots in the Loving More community, who have been studying and practicing this kind of relationship model for decades, are a little skeptical about the so-called next generation of polyamorists. In a speech Alan gave at the 2016 Rocky Mountain Poly Living Conference in Denver, he said, “I keep hearing disturbing ways that the word ‘polyamory,’ as it spreads, is being used out there as just a hip-sounding new term for old-style screwing around
without regard for other people.” This must be particularly frustrating, as Alan and people like him have been practicing some version of nonmonogamy for decades—and they’re still doing it.

  I know you said polyamory isn’t only about sex, but isn’t it?

  Hey, don’t take my word for it. Even sex columnist Dan Savage, who gets a lot of credit for popularizing the practice of polyamory for a new generation (Savage and his husband are famously “monogamish”), says that polyamory isn’t about just sex for him.

  “Because we were a gay couple when we came out as being in an open relationship, people made a lot of assumptions about our sex life,” Savage told me. “Everyone seemed to think we were kind of slutty—and not always in a bad way, because we run in a very sex-positive crowd. People thought we were just going out all the time and picking up as many random guys as we could; they thought we were inviting strangers into our house constantly. But that’s not how it was at all; we were sleeping with each other more than with anyone else. We were more monogamous than not. So it became clear that being in an open relationship was a spectrum.” He added that most of the men he and his husband sleep with are regulars; they’re people Savage and his husband consider part of the family, so to speak.

  How is polyamory different from open relationships?

  We will talk a lot about this, so don’t worry. But here’s my short answer: if relationship models were geometrical shapes (bear with me), open relationships would be rectangles, and polyamorous relationships would be squares. By that I mean all polyamorous relationships are open, but not all open relationships are polyamorous. An open relationship is simply a nonmonogamous one; a polyamorous relationship requires a specific kind of commitment to the people with whom one is romantically involved. Polyamory requires transparency, communication, and enthusiastic consent. Open relationships embrace polyamory, but they might also include relationships centered on dating around, or don’t-ask-don’t-tell relationships.