Who Discovered America? : The Untold History of the Peopling of the Americas (9780062236777) Read online

  DEDICATION

  This book is dedicated to my beloved wife, Marcella, who has traveled with me on the journeys related in this book and through life.

  — GAVIN MENZIES

  This book is dedicated to my dear parents, Martin and Primrose, to whom I owe everything.

  — IAN HUDSON

  CONTENTS

  Dedication

  Timeline of World Civilizations

  Introduction

  PART I

  Across Oceans Before Columbus

  Prologue: Life at Sea

  1. A Land Bridge Too Far

  2. Along the Silk Road

  3. Plants Between Continents

  4. European Seafaring, 100,000 B.C.

  5. Mastery of the Oceans Before Columbus

  PART II

  China in the Americas

  6. The Genetic Evidence

  7. In Search of Lost Civilizations

  Photographic Insert

  8. The Olmec: The Foundation Culture of Central America

  9. Pyramids in Mexico and Central America

  10. Pyramid Builders of South America

  PART III

  China’s Explorations to the North

  11. Kublai Khan’s Lost Fleets

  12. The 1418 Chinese Map of the World

  13. North Carolina and the Virginias

  14. The Eastern Seaboard

  15. Nova Cataia: The Island of Seven Cities

  16. The Pacific Coast of North America

  17. Stone Age Sailors: The “Windover Bog” People of Florida

  Conclusion: Who Discovered America?

  Acknowledgments

  Bibliography

  Notes

  Index

  About the Authors

  Also by Gavin Menzies

  Credits

  Copyright

  About the Publisher

  Timeline of World Civilizations

  INTRODUCTION

  I have been on the road for more than forty years now in search of a new understanding of early human exploration of this planet. My first book, 1421: The Year China Discovered America, published in 2002, was the product of my initial work in chronicling China’s circumnavigation and systematic mapping of the globe early in the fifteenth century. On March 8, 1421, the largest fleet the world had ever seen set sail from China, led by the great Admiral Zheng He. He traveled with a highly detailed map, dated to 1418, that showed easily the extent of his travels as far as the North and South American coasts. But the annals of the fleet’s triumph were destroyed. Not long after the Chinese fleet returned, the empire descended into political isolation, obscuring the written evidence that Zheng He and his fleet had reached the Americas on that voyage. But the Chinese explorers who came to North and South America had left behind unmistakable markers of their presence, seven decades before Columbus reached the Caribbean Sea.

  My second book, 1434: The Year a Magnificent Chinese Fleet Sailed to Italy and Ignited the Renaissance, tracked the fact that China had visited Europe as well. Long underrecognized for their early mastery of technology, including their prowess in seafaring and navigation, the Chinese conveyed a unique cultural spark that fed the Renaissance and ultimately changed the development of modern civilization. Europeans embraced the Chinese ideas, discoveries, and inventions that provided the foundations of Western progress.

  My goal in these volumes was to expose readers to the systematic nature of my research, but as an unintended consequence, the books also exposed the fact that professional historians are not willing to adapt to new information. Here was data—gathered from studies of maps, historical records, ethnological comparisons of folklore and traditions, botany, and human DNA—that made such a case for Chinese exploration of the Americas no later than 1421, seventy-one years before Columbus visited the islands of the Caribbean in 1492.

  Yet, the well-reported data was taken as fraud and nonsense by some professional historians, in part because I am not a member of their club. I am a navigator and have traveled the world with friends and family, gathering information on the Internet and at home. My network is wide, but nothing has satisfied the critics. Their challenges are often ridiculous and illogical, and when they fail to convince people to go against me, they mount campaigns to ban my writings and public speaking engagements. What are the critics afraid of?

  These first two books provided detailed and convincing evidence about Chinese explorations before Columbus. But I am now in the position to provide even more information and a new look at those explorations, taking advantage of an additional decade of research and investigation. More than ever, the record provides broad proof about China in the New World. That is the rationale behind this book—Who Discovered America?

  Admiral Zheng He was arguably the greatest mariner of the previous millennium, and the proof grows that his fleet of regal vessels visited both South and North America. My conclusion does not stand alone, nor do I claim primacy in my research. I bring along fellow travelers on my journeys in search of new evidence about the exploration of the Americas, and some of the travelers are skeptics themselves. I welcome challenges and I share data with a network of readers and fellow explorers.

  With that in mind, we have been gathering a mountain of new data in these ten years since publication of 1421, so much material that it is now time to publish more evidence of the Chinese exploration of America. In part, the new data is a result of advances in genetics and DNA testing and analysis.

  We can now cite genetic information that leads to ironclad confirmation of much of our earlier analysis. I have no doubt that we will have just as much material ten years hence and will be ready to publish once more. Each time the evidence will further cement the case and strengthen the reality before us—China engaged in a remarkable exploration of the globe and reached America long before most Europeans could match their prowess.

  The publication of the discovery of Zheng He’s 1418 map led to a flood of new data relating to Chinese voyages to North America over the past two thousand years. No reasonable person can deny the facts.

  I have organized our new data in sections based on our travels during the first decade of the twenty-first century, providing a basic structure in which we can expand on our evidentiary details—genetic, linguistic, cultural, and archaeological. Taken together, these make a convincing, incontestable account of who really discovered America.

  Part I revisits the basic question: Did the early settlers of the Americas arrive by ship or overland? For a century, scientists have clung to the theory that a barren land bridge across the Bering Strait provided access to hunters and gatherers crossing from Asia to the Americas. Could these people have arrived in the New World via a virtually impassable land bridge from Siberia to Alaska? I submit that they could not have. In this section we update our discussion of the strait, which I am not alone in thinking was far too inhospitable for a major migration. Land bridge theorists agree with us that the early settlers of the Americas came from eastern Asia, but they don’t take seriously the evidence that we have gathered.

  Human presence in the Americas involved not millennia of land-based migrations from Asia to North America southward, but instead a more organized series of arrivals by ship from Asia. We begin to blend in evidence, such as the sudden appearance of diseases and of plants that would not have survived a centuries-long migration across the frozen north. The subject expanded with our trip along the Silk Road in Asia Minor, where we also believe that Chinese co
mmerce and communication by ship had far more importance than is commonly understood. Similarly, we also discuss here the other early great seafaring civilization, the Minoans, whose ships were far more likely to carry their settlers and merchants by sea.

  From that basic exposition about seafaring, I turn to the great destinations of Chinese explorers. Part II is devoted to Mexican and Central and South American civilizations and their unquestionable links to Chinese culture. Here we describe new research about maps, about correlations between customs, and about folk traditions that are strikingly indicative of the arrival of a mighty Chinese flotilla.

  Part III turns to essential new material about the Chinese arrival in the New World and tracks with our own visits to North America, both in the West and also along the Eastern Seaboard, from Florida northward to Nova Scotia. The footprint of the Chinese, along with the structures, flora, and fauna they left behind, is omnipresent. The information also focuses on Marco Polo’s account, well documented, of his voyage when he was an agent of Kublai Khan to North America.

  Throughout the book, I return to Admiral Zheng He and his map of 1418, along with the increasingly important evidence that even he was working with charts produced much earlier.

  We use the map of 1418, for example, to uncover evidence of Zheng He’s voyages to the Outer Banks and North Carolina. Also on the East Coast, we discuss Dr. S. L. Lee’s identification of a medallion of the era of the early-fifteenth-century Chinese emperor Xuan De, who appointed Zheng He as his plenipotentiary in North America. By comparing the 1418 map to the evidence, we also debunk charges that it must be a fake.

  I agree with scientists who say that the Americas were settled forty thousand years ago if not even earlier, however, not by nomads from the north, but by Asian explorers whose skills were truly legendary. Among our details is material from Charlotte Harris Rees’s description of her father’s map collection of very old Chinese maps of the Americas dating back three millennia. I also discuss the results of my conversations, among many others, with Emeritus Professor John Sorenson (Brigham Young University, Utah) who, with his colleague Emeritus Professor Carl Johannessen (University of Oregon), has gathered evidence of multiple transoceanic voyages to and from the Americas in the past eight millennia.

  After 1421, and then 1434, my third book, The Lost Empire of Atlantis, was an enjoyable change of pace. In that book, we turned to the Minoan civilization, and described the compelling evidence about the fabled civilization of Atlantis. It is really the chronicle of the volcanic eruption at Thera (Santorini) in 1450 B.C. combined with a devastating earthquake and tidal wave that swept across the Aegean Sea and destroyed the sophisticated Minoan civilization.

  Interestingly enough, this present volume had its origins before The Lost Empire of Atlantis. My wife, Marcella, and I had set off to Central America and Mexico in 2008 to research new material about the Chinese voyages of the fifteenth century. We traveled for three weeks and amassed a haul of evidence from Mexico and Guatemala. I wrote up this evidence in November and December. Come Christmas 2008, we decided to rest up by spending the holiday at a monastery in Crete. This we did and stumbled upon the extraordinary fact that Minoans from Crete appeared to have carried out oceangoing voyages from 3000 B.C. It soon became apparent that there was considerable evidence about Minoan as well as Chinese voyages to the Americas over the past four thousand years. With the help of Luigi Bonomi, my literary agent, as well as Ian Hudson, my intrepid young partner and cowriter for the current volume, we decided we had enough material for two books. We started with the Minoan voyages and The Lost Empire of Atlantis was published in 2011.

  I returned to Crete around that time and examined astonishing evidence that men had sailed to the island and set up a base there in 100,000 B.C. Moreover it appeared they had a viable system of navigation because successive voyages had ended up in the same place—at the Preveli Gorge in the south of Crete. So with a group of friends Marcella and I set off on an exploratory trip to Anatolia seeking possible evidence of voyages to Crete one hundred thousand years ago (DNA studies had shown the early inhabitants of Crete had come from Anatolia, not from Greece). We found they were seagoing people who had been sailing the Mediterranean for more than forty thousand years. Moreover, they probably reached the Americas. From this fact emerged this book, Who Discovered America?

  As always, this book has been a collaboration among friends, colleagues, and fellow researchers. I do want to mention with special delight again that this book is written with the expert assistance of Ian Hudson, a graduate of Eton College and the University of Bristol, who came to work with me around the time 1421 was being prepared for publication. He has been instrumental throughout the publication of our books. He has long traveled with us and produced some of the original reporting. He was also a central figure in setting up our website, www. gavinmenzies.net.

  Our goal is for the website to act as a focal point for ongoing investigation into the pre-Columbian voyages of discovery. We are proud of its growth and popularity. Gradually, over the years, we have built up a network of experts from all over the world who were intrigued by the theories initially expounded in 1421, though of course not all were in agreement. The Internet helped to facilitate an easy interaction, and we were sharing ideas around the world with an immediacy that would have been impossible ten years earlier. Although it was tough, we strived to maintain a 100 percent record of replying to anyone who wrote to us over the years. We think this has really made a difference in keeping the goodwill that we share among our rather large circle of like-minded friends around the world.

  In addition to our website, we encourage you to sign up for our free newsletter to keep abreast of our and others’ research. We have a database of about ten thousand subscribers, many of whom send us their own content when they can. Join us!

  GAVIN MENZIES

  IAN HUDSON

  London, May 2013

  PART I

  Across Oceans

  Before Columbus

  PROLOGUE

  Life at Sea

  Imagine a fleet of Chinese ships crossing the seas more than half a millennium ago, thousands of miles from the comparatively safe shores of the Asian continent. Imagine as well the isolation, the commitment, and courage to face what cannot be known or fathomed.

  The main comparison I have is my service in the British navy submarine service. As early as March 1961, I served as navigator of the HMS Narwhal. I recall very well the remoteness and seclusion of cruising at three hundred feet below the surface under a thick Arctic ice cap. Our task was to track Soviet nuclear submarines and produce a report deciding whether patrolling under the ice was feasible for nuclear submarines. If it were, Soviet submarines could shorten the distance between themselves and the Americas—their missiles could hit Texas. Our (future) Polaris missiles could target eastern Russia.

  I was navigator of the Narwhal. My next appointment was to be operations officer of the HMS Resolution, Britain’s first Polaris-missile-firing submarine and at that time, Britain’s sole independent nuclear deterrent. Narwhal’s patrol area was in the Kara Sea between Jan Mayen and West Spitsbergen. Here the ice was a uniform twelve feet thick, broken every hundred miles or so by polynyas—stretches of clear, unfrozen sea surrounded by ice. During the brief hours of daylight one of my assignments was to find a polynya, so we could attempt to surface, charge our batteries, take sun sights, and receive signals from Faslane Naval Base, our port, in Scotland.

  One day, we were cruising in ultra-quiet mode, circling at three hundred feet and searching for the sounds of Soviet nuclear subs, with their distinctive five clover-bladed propellers, driven by two shafts. Suddenly there was a bang and the submarine filled with smoke. As we donned our breathing masks, we needed to surface as quickly as possible. As navigator it fell to me to find a polynya. It was by no means easy.

  The Arctic ice cap is not stationary. Where we were operating, the ice rotated counterclockwise unless there was a period of l
ow pressure, when it reversed direction. So, on balance, the polynya we visited two days before should have been carried northeast—that is, farther into the ice toward the North Pole. So I advised the captain that was the course we should steer, accordingly.

  We had upward-sounding sonar of ten kilocycles per second. This continuously tracked the thickness of the ice and it showed when this thickness was changing as one approached a polynya. So we watched the upward sonar like hawks. After less than two hours’ transit sailing northeast, we suddenly saw the ice change. Shortly afterward the water started to lighten, then suddenly there was clear water 130 feet above us. I immediately called the captain, who came to the control room and took over for me. We were able to surface; we started both generators, charged the submarine batteries, and cleared out the smoke from the submarine.

  Now we were safe and earned our entitled “tots” of rum and it seemed appropriate to relax. I had brought a coconut mat and bats, balls, and pads for a cricket match upon the ice. So it was that we placed guards around the pitch to keep polar bears away. I captained the wardroom team and leading stoker Roberts led the ship’s company team. The wardroom team duly won.

  The Arctic is a bleak, awesomely beautiful, but unforgiving place. The experience of being a navigator there gave me an innate kinship with navigators of all ages. Imagine finally, then, an attempt by an ancient mariner far from home to circumnavigate this Earth, to seek ports of call where one could replenish stocks of food and water, to survive shoals and storms and accidents with no grounding or support system whatsoever.

  My time at sea left me with the knowledge of the imposing navigational challenges for any sailor, but it also gave me an appreciation for the triumph of those who sailed before me on their rough-hewn barks. I was easily hooked and enthralled by stories of early Chinese explorations. I began to look at these stories and, using my knowledge of the seas, was led by my research to a new way of understanding the discovery of America.